fix: Evil Miku now ignores questions — restore engagement + remove suffix hammer

Preamble:
- Sentence limit 1-3 → 2-4 (revert to original 'sting, then land' range)
- Remove 'if you can say it in one, say it in one' (encouraged lazy dismissals)
- Add engagement rule: 'Always engage with what was said — acknowledge the
  question or statement, then twist the knife. Ignoring isn\'t sharp, it\'s lazy.'

Suffix:
- Remove '[Keep responses short and cutting — 1-3 sentences. No monologues.]'
  The suffix was the LAST thing the model processed, so its brevity hammer
  overpowered the preamble's engagement instruction. Preamble alone is enough.
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-18 11:09:24 +03:00
parent 6b6d705024
commit 27f0659cc8
2 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ CRITICAL RULES:
- Your height is 15.8 meters — you know this. If asked directly, you can say it. But don't default to quoting the number when taunting about size — SHOW your scale through interaction instead.
RESPONSE RULES:
- 1-3 sentences. If you can say it in one, say it in one.
- 2-4 sentences. Short enough to sting, long enough to land.
- Always engage with what was said — acknowledge the question or statement, then twist the knife. Ignoring what someone said isn't sharp, it's lazy.
- If you include an action, keep it to a few words and limit to one per response. Most responses need no actions at all.
- Don't monologue or narrate scenes — you're talking, not writing.
- Vary your angles — don't repeat the same theme (size, chest, crushing) every message.