2026-08-23 23:18:14 +02:00
|
|
|
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
|
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
|
|
|
checkAuthSecret,
|
|
|
|
|
checkProxyHops,
|
|
|
|
|
countForwardedHops,
|
|
|
|
|
checkAlbumIds,
|
2026-09-22 14:12:13 +02:00
|
|
|
checkAlbumSlugCollisions,
|
2026-08-23 23:18:14 +02:00
|
|
|
checkAlbumsShared,
|
|
|
|
|
checkPasswords,
|
|
|
|
|
checkWritable,
|
|
|
|
|
checkImmichCalls,
|
|
|
|
|
worstLevel,
|
|
|
|
|
} from '../admin/doctor';
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 14:12:13 +02:00
|
|
|
/** A stand-in for lib/config/schema.ts's slugify(), good enough to test the
|
|
|
|
|
* grouping logic without doctor.ts importing anything (see its own comment). */
|
|
|
|
|
const testSlug = (name: string) =>
|
|
|
|
|
name
|
|
|
|
|
.toLowerCase()
|
|
|
|
|
.replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, '-')
|
|
|
|
|
.replace(/^-+|-+$/g, '');
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-23 23:18:14 +02:00
|
|
|
describe('checkAuthSecret', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
it('accepts a long secret', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkAuthSecret('a'.repeat(64)).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('warns about a short one', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAuthSecret('short');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.title).toContain('5 characters');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('errors when absent', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkAuthSecret(undefined).level).toBe('error');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** The report is shown in a browser and pasted into issues. */
|
|
|
|
|
it('never repeats the secret itself', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const secret = 'super-secret-value-nobody-should-see';
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAuthSecret(secret);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(f)).not.toContain(secret);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe('countForwardedHops', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
it('counts the entries of a chain', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(countForwardedHops('203.0.113.1, 10.0.0.1')).toBe(2);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(countForwardedHops('203.0.113.1')).toBe(1);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('treats an absent or empty header as no proxy', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(countForwardedHops(null)).toBe(0);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(countForwardedHops('')).toBe(0);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(countForwardedHops(' , ')).toBe(0);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Both directions fail silently today: too high and the lookup runs off the end
|
|
|
|
|
* of the chain, too low and the IP comes from a header the client writes.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
describe('checkProxyHops', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
it('is happy when the value matches what arrived', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkProxyHops(1, 1, true).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkProxyHops(0, 0, false).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('warns when a chain arrived but no hops are configured', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkProxyHops(0, 2, true);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('spoofing');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('warns when more hops are configured than arrived', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkProxyHops(3, 2, true).level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** An admin on the LAN legitimately sees no chain — say so, do not accuse. */
|
|
|
|
|
it('explains the direct-admin case instead of calling it broken', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkProxyHops(1, 0, false);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('directly');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Next fills X-Forwarded-For with the socket address when a request arrives
|
|
|
|
|
* without one, so a lone entry is what a *direct* request looks like. Warning
|
|
|
|
|
* on that would fire on every deployment that has no proxy at all.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
it('does not mistake the header Next writes itself for a proxy', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkProxyHops(0, 1, false);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.title).toContain('No reverse proxy');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('does trust a lone entry when a real proxy header backs it up', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkProxyHops(0, 1, true);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('spoofing');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('accepts one configured hop against one corroborated entry', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkProxyHops(1, 1, true).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-09-22 14:12:13 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
|
* Cloudflare (1 hop) in front of nginx (1 more, 2 total) with the value set
|
|
|
|
|
* to 1 used to report "matches the observed chain" — the client IP was
|
|
|
|
|
* actually read from the Cloudflare edge address, so every visitor behind
|
|
|
|
|
* that PoP shared one rate-limit bucket (#629).
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
it('warns, not passes, when fewer hops are configured than arrived', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkProxyHops(1, 2, true);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.title).toContain('1');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.title).toContain('2');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
2026-08-23 23:18:14 +02:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe('checkAlbumIds', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const known = [
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'a', albumName: 'Japan' },
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'b', albumName: 'Poland' },
|
|
|
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('passes when every configured album resolves', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkAlbumIds(['a', 'b'], known).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('names the ids Immich does not know', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAlbumIds(['a', 'ghost'], known);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('error');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('ghost');
|
2026-09-19 22:24:10 +02:00
|
|
|
expect(f.albumIds).toEqual(['ghost']);
|
2026-08-23 23:18:14 +02:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('flags an empty gallery', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkAlbumIds([], known).level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Never an error: publishing an unshared album has always worked (#515). */
|
|
|
|
|
describe('checkAlbumsShared', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const known = [
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'a', albumName: 'Japan', shared: true },
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'b', albumName: 'Private trip', shared: false },
|
|
|
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('is quiet when everything published is shared', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkAlbumsShared(['a'], known).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('warns and names the unshared album', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAlbumsShared(['a', 'b'], known);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('Private trip');
|
2026-09-19 22:24:10 +02:00
|
|
|
expect(f.albumIds).toEqual(['b']);
|
2026-08-23 23:18:14 +02:00
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** An older Immich may not report the flag; silence beats a false alarm. */
|
|
|
|
|
it('says nothing when the flag is absent', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkAlbumsShared(['x'], [{ id: 'x', albumName: 'Unknown' }]).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-22 14:12:13 +02:00
|
|
|
describe('checkAlbumSlugCollisions', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const known = [
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'a', albumName: 'Japan Trip' },
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'b', albumName: 'Japan-Trip' },
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'c', albumName: 'Iceland' },
|
|
|
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('is quiet when nothing collides', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAlbumSlugCollisions(
|
|
|
|
|
[{ context: 'gallery.yaml albums', albumIds: ['a', 'c'] }],
|
|
|
|
|
{},
|
|
|
|
|
known,
|
|
|
|
|
testSlug,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('flags two albums in the same group whose Immich names slugify alike', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAlbumSlugCollisions(
|
|
|
|
|
[{ context: 'gallery.yaml albums', albumIds: ['a', 'b'] }],
|
|
|
|
|
{},
|
|
|
|
|
known,
|
|
|
|
|
testSlug,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('error');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('Japan Trip');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('Japan-Trip');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.albumIds).toEqual(['a', 'b']);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('does not flag the same collision across two different groups', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
// /trips-a/japan-trip and /trips-b/japan-trip are different URLs.
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAlbumSlugCollisions(
|
|
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
|
{ context: 'subpage "Trips A"', albumIds: ['a'] },
|
|
|
|
|
{ context: 'subpage "Trips B"', albumIds: ['b'] },
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
{},
|
|
|
|
|
known,
|
|
|
|
|
testSlug,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('prefers a title override over the Immich name', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAlbumSlugCollisions(
|
|
|
|
|
[{ context: 'gallery.yaml albums', albumIds: ['a', 'c'] }],
|
|
|
|
|
{ c: 'Japan Trip' }, // overrides "Iceland" — now collides with "a"
|
|
|
|
|
known,
|
|
|
|
|
testSlug,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('error');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('says nothing about an id Immich does not know and has no override', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkAlbumSlugCollisions(
|
|
|
|
|
[{ context: 'gallery.yaml albums', albumIds: ['a', 'ghost'] }],
|
|
|
|
|
{},
|
|
|
|
|
known,
|
|
|
|
|
testSlug,
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-23 23:18:14 +02:00
|
|
|
describe('checkPasswords', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
it('passes when everything is hashed', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkPasswords([{ label: 'Site', value: 'scrypt:aa:bb' }]).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('warns about plaintext and names where it lives', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkPasswords([
|
|
|
|
|
{ label: 'Site', value: 'scrypt:aa:bb' },
|
|
|
|
|
{ label: 'Album japan-2024', value: 'hunter2' },
|
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('Album japan-2024');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/** Bcrypt cannot be verified at all any more — that is broken, not sloppy. */
|
|
|
|
|
it('errors on a leftover bcrypt hash', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkPasswords([{ label: 'Site', value: '$2b$10$abcdefghijklmno' }]).level).toBe(
|
|
|
|
|
'error',
|
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('never repeats a password', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkPasswords([{ label: 'Album x', value: 'hunter2' }]);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(JSON.stringify(f)).not.toContain('hunter2');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe('checkWritable', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
it('passes when nothing is blocked', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(checkWritable([]).level).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('errors and names the paths', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkWritable(['content/', 'content/.backups']);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('error');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('content/.backups');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe('checkImmichCalls', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
it('passes when every call came back', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
|
|
|
checkImmichCalls([
|
|
|
|
|
{ endpoint: '/server/ping', ok: true },
|
|
|
|
|
{ endpoint: '/albums', ok: true },
|
|
|
|
|
]).level,
|
|
|
|
|
).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it('names the failing endpoint', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
const f = checkImmichCalls([
|
|
|
|
|
{ endpoint: '/server/ping', ok: true },
|
|
|
|
|
{ endpoint: '/albums', ok: false },
|
|
|
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.level).toBe('error');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(f.detail).toContain('/albums');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
describe('worstLevel', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
it('reports the most severe finding', () => {
|
|
|
|
|
expect(worstLevel([{ id: 'a', level: 'ok', title: '', detail: '' }])).toBe('ok');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
|
|
|
worstLevel([
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'a', level: 'ok', title: '', detail: '' },
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'b', level: 'warn', title: '', detail: '' },
|
|
|
|
|
]),
|
|
|
|
|
).toBe('warn');
|
|
|
|
|
expect(
|
|
|
|
|
worstLevel([
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'a', level: 'warn', title: '', detail: '' },
|
|
|
|
|
{ id: 'b', level: 'error', title: '', detail: '' },
|
|
|
|
|
]),
|
|
|
|
|
).toBe('error');
|
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
|
});
|